Free Proxy Websites 2026: Top 15 Best & Reliable Options

Need a free proxy site you can use directly in your browser? Start with browser-based options such as ProxySite and KProxy, then check whether Hidester, hide.me, or Megaproxy currently offer a working web proxy. This list also includes VPN apps and business proxy services: not all 15 tools are free web proxies.

Quick answer: A web proxy lets you enter a URL and load some websites through a remote server. It can change the IP address seen by the destination for proxied requests, but it does not guarantee anonymity, protect every app, or replace a trustworthy VPN or dedicated proxy.

How this comparison was prepared: We distinguish the type and intended use of each product instead of claiming to have independently benchmarked uptime, speed, privacy practices, or current free plans. Confirm details on the provider's official site before relying on a service. For platform-specific use cases, see how to choose a proxy for Facebook, Amazon, Instagram, and Shopify.

1. ProxySite – Free Web Proxy with a Straightforward Interface

Type: browser-based web proxy. Best for: trying to open public websites without installing a separate application.

ProxySite is closely related to the search intent behind the query “proxy site”: visit the provider's website, choose an available server if offered, enter a destination URL, and check whether the site loads. This is different from buying an HTTP or SOCKS5 proxy and configuring it in a browser profile.

Pros: straightforward workflow and low setup friction. Limitations: websites with complex JavaScript, logins, streaming, or anti-abuse controls may fail to work correctly. An HTTPS connection is not proof that a proxy operator cannot access data. Avoid submitting passwords, payment details, or private documents to unverified services.

Learn what residential proxies are if you need a more controlled IP setup.

2. HMA (Hide My Ass) – Longstanding Privacy and VPN Brand

Type: VPN provider with a historical connection to web proxy services. HMA was established in 2005 by Jack Cator. Its offerings have evolved, so do not assume an older free URL-based web proxy remains available today.

A VPN routes selected traffic through an encrypted tunnel and can change the public IP address seen by the destination. Unlike a URL-entry proxy, a VPN often requires an application and a subscription or trial arrangement. Pros: potentially more suitable for device-level connectivity. Limitations: service coverage, pricing, device support, and any trial must be confirmed with HMA. A VPN does not hide all browser-identifying signals or guarantee anonymity.

Best for: readers interested in a VPN rather than an instant web proxy website.

3. Kproxy

Type: web proxy, with additional browser-related options depending on the provider's current offerings.

KProxy is another name to consider when you want to request a public website through an intermediary. Check the official interface, free-use conditions, session limits, and available locations rather than assuming unlimited access.

Pros: relatively easy browser-based starting point. Limitations: speed and compatibility can vary; session cookies, accounts, and browser fingerprints may still identify you to destination services. Best for: temporary access to non-sensitive public content and testing whether a page loads.

4. Hidester

Type: web proxy service known for URL-based browsing.

Hidester has appeared in proxy-site comparisons for years. When evaluating it, look beyond vague claims about encryption strength: confirm current HTTPS support, website compatibility, privacy information, and whether its web proxy still operates.

Pros: may avoid the need for system-level proxy configuration. Limitations: the older claim that a specific encryption bit length guarantees safety on every browser is not substantiated. Best for: comparing browser-based proxies for public information.

5. Ultrasurf

Type: circumvention software, not simply a free webpage where you paste a URL.

Ultrasurf is associated with connecting through restricted networks. How traffic is routed depends on the particular release, environment, and settings. It should not be described as constantly rotating IP addresses in every session unless that behavior is documented and verified.

Pros: designed around reaching online services where access is restricted. Limitations: software may be required, availability can vary, and there is no promise of universal access or complete anonymity. Best for: users assessing a dedicated connection application rather than a web-only proxy.

6. Psiphon

Type: circumvention application using different transport methods and connection modes.

Psiphon is associated with techniques involving VPN, SSH, and proxies, depending on the platform. Its purpose is different from a simple URL-entry website. Evaluate operating-system support, limits, and the current privacy policy before adopting it.

Pros: connection options for restricted networks. Limitations: routing coverage and speeds depend on mode and environment; not every application is necessarily covered in every configuration. Best for: people seeking access tools for restricted connectivity.

7. Cyberghost

Type: commercial VPN, not a directly comparable free web proxy.

CyberGhost offers a different experience from a browser-based proxy site: users generally connect through VPN software and a chosen server. Such a connection can change the public IP seen by websites for routed traffic.

Pros: relevant when the need is a VPN rather than one-off webpage loading. Limitations: subscription terms, trials, platform support, streaming behavior, and any refund policy must be checked on official pages. VPN use does not prevent all tracking through browser cookies or logged-in accounts.

8. Bright Data

Type: professional proxy infrastructure and web-data services.

Bright Data is geared toward projects that require configurable proxy networks and technical workflows. It does not belong in the same free-in-browser category as ProxySite or KProxy, even though both involve intermediary connections.

Pros: professional configuration options that may suit teams and web-data workflows. Limitations: pricing, IP categories, permissions, and legal or website-specific rules require review. Best for: organizations with defined proxy requirements rather than occasional anonymous browsing.

9. SafeIP

Type: software historically described as an IP-hiding or proxy-related application; current maintenance status needs verification.

Do not treat SafeIP as a confirmed current free web proxy without checking its official source. If you find an installer, verify the publisher, software version, digital signature, updates, and privacy terms. This matters especially for software advertised on third-party download websites.

Potential benefit: IP-related features if a legitimate maintained product is available. Limitations: avoid unsupported claims of whole-device encryption, universal compatibility, or guaranteed safety. Best for: technically cautious readers prepared to validate an older software product.

10. Freegate

Type: software for accessing online services in restricted-network environments.

Freegate is linked to network circumvention approaches rather than a typical paste-a-URL web proxy. Effectiveness varies by local network conditions, product availability, and applicable rules.

Pros: a different connectivity approach from browser-only tools. Limitations: no tool can promise to bypass every restriction or deliver complete anonymity. Verify source authenticity before downloading software. Best for: readers researching dedicated connectivity applications.

11. Smartproxy

Type: dedicated proxy service brand; brand naming and product portfolio should be checked for current accuracy.

Smartproxy has appeared in discussions of residential and datacenter proxy products. Older figures such as “40 million IPs across 195 countries” should not be reused without a current official source. A commercial proxy plan typically involves settings, authentication, and ongoing cost rather than entering a link into a free proxy page.

Pros: potentially useful for projects requiring controlled IP settings. Limitations: usually paid and requires configuration. Best for: teams with recurring proxy needs.

12. Hide.me

Type: privacy/VPN provider that has also offered web proxy access.

A hide.me web proxy, if currently available, should be evaluated as a browser-based option. VPN protocols such as OpenVPN or IKEv2 are not features of the web proxy page itself. Check the currently offered service, available locations, and any free-use limits separately.

Pros: relevant to readers comparing both web proxy and VPN approaches. Limitations: complex websites may not work as expected through web proxy interfaces; provider plans can change. Best for: readers who want to compare web-only access with a broader VPN option.

13. Whoer

Type: IP and privacy-related tools; do not automatically assume every Whoer page provides a free web proxy.

A tool that displays your IP, connection details, or browser signals can be useful for checking a proxy setup, but running an IP test does not change your IP address. Make sure you distinguish an IP checker from a traffic-routing service.

Pros: checking the visible IP and connection conditions. Limitations: statements of zero logging or complete anonymity require current evidence. Best for: verifying connectivity and understanding what a destination can observe.

14. Megaproxy

Type: established web proxy name; confirm current accessibility and service terms.

Megaproxy has long appeared in web proxy listings. Rather than relying on old claims about FTP, JavaScript, remote cookies, or universally compatible HTML, test whether its current service loads the public sites you need and whether its privacy policy is acceptable.

Pros: historically relevant to online web proxy comparisons. Limitations: current feature availability and free use must be checked. Best for: readers surveying longstanding browser-based proxy alternatives.

15. Oxylabs – Professional Proxy Infrastructure for Business

Type: professional proxy network and web-data solutions.

Oxylabs is more appropriate for structured business workflows than quick, free website browsing. Offerings may include different IP classes and technical integration options. The size of the network and geographical coverage should be sourced from up-to-date official product information, not old figures copied from other articles.

Pros: options for teams needing dedicated proxy workflows. Limitations: costs, authentication, configuration, and compliance responsibilities. Best for: business teams and technically managed projects.

See the difference between datacenter and residential proxies.

16. Should You Use a Free Proxy?

Sometimes, yes — for low-risk public browsing and only when you trust the provider. A free web proxy is generally a poor default for sensitive logins, financial transactions, or confidential documents. Check the official domain, privacy terms, HTTPS handling, cookie behavior, and practical limits before use.

Choose by task: a web proxy is convenient for a URL within a browser tab; a VPN app may route broader traffic depending on settings; and a dedicated residential or datacenter proxy is more appropriate when you need deliberate IP assignment and ongoing configuration. None guarantees total anonymity or prevents every type of account restriction.

If you manage authorized browser profiles for different projects, Hidemium provides separately configured profiles for cookies, session data, browser settings, and proxy connections. It does not guarantee immunity from account reviews or service rules.

Explore Hidemium downloads and trial options. You can also review free proxy tools and how to choose proxies for different platforms.

Bottom line: This is a comparison of 15 proxy-related tools, not 15 guaranteed free web proxy sites. Start with an actual browser-based proxy for simple public browsing. For long-term tasks, choose a managed solution based on price, privacy, compatibility, and the rules of the services you access.